| Author | Post |
|---|
Seagull
Member
| Joined: | Fri May 30th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 10 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 7th, 2008 04:45 pm |
|
What size of football are used at U14 ?
Is it size 4 or size 5 ?
|
Edina1995
Member
| Joined: | Sun Jun 1st, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 15 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 7th, 2008 04:46 pm |
|
Size 4
I think they don,t use a size 5 till u15,s
|
onside
Member
|
Posted: Sat Jun 7th, 2008 05:06 pm |
|
| 13s use size 4, 14s upwards use size 5.
|
sb
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jun 7th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 10 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 7th, 2008 05:24 pm |
|
| size 5 it is at u14
|
Edina1995
Member
| Joined: | Sun Jun 1st, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 15 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 7th, 2008 05:29 pm |
|
r u sure
|
sb
Member
| Joined: | Sat Jun 7th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 10 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 7th, 2008 05:49 pm |
|
| defo 110 percent
|
Edina1995
Member
| Joined: | Sun Jun 1st, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 15 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 7th, 2008 05:50 pm |
|
| ta
|
RedhallFc
Member
| Joined: | Mon Jun 2nd, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 21 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 9th, 2008 02:16 pm |
|
yes its size 5 when you go to 14s...
|
Seagull
Member
| Joined: | Fri May 30th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 10 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 24th, 2008 01:29 pm |
|
At the AGM the league set up for next season agreed as 4 divisions. Top 3 divisions with 12 teams and a 4th division of 11 teams.
Comments ?
|
newboy
Member
| Joined: | Tue Jun 3rd, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 8 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 24th, 2008 01:54 pm |
|
seagull,
thanks for the info,
last season division 1 only had 8 teams and 3/4 of them were off very poor standard , just look at the leagues table , 10 teams max as cant see what benefit it is for certain teams who will get hammered
saying that footy is a funny game and perhaps the standard will improve ,
how is it decided which 12 ? is it a choice or is it no relegation 4 up ?
Last edited on Tue Jun 24th, 2008 02:55 pm by newboy
|
Malteser
Member
| Joined: | Wed Jun 25th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 3 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 25th, 2008 01:52 pm |
|
newboy wrote: seagull,
thanks for the info,
last season division 1 only had 8 teams and 3/4 of them were off very poor standard , just look at the leagues table , 10 teams max as cant see what benefit it is for certain teams who will get hammered
saying that footy is a funny game and perhaps the standard will improve ,
how is it decided which 12 ? is it a choice or is it no relegation 4 up ?
The league tables don't tell you that 3 or 4 sides in Division I were of a very poor standard. They tell you that there was a gulf between the top and the bottom but no more than that.
The overall standard in Division I was very good. Leith Athletic was out of sight better than all the rest. They are an exceptionally good team, but that doesn't mean that other teams in the division should be deemed 'very poor'.
However, it could only be a good thing if the other teams in Division I were to close the gap on Leith next season.
Incidentally, there will be 11 teams in Division I next season.
|
newboy
Member
| Joined: | Tue Jun 3rd, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 8 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 25th, 2008 02:00 pm |
|
malteser,
fair points and cheers
11 teams is a strange number a gap week , surely it should have been an even number
but lets hope so , cant see anyone getting close to leith though
|
Malteser
Member
| Joined: | Wed Jun 25th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 3 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 25th, 2008 02:34 pm |
|
newboy wrote: malteser,
fair points and cheers
11 teams is a strange number a gap week , surely it should have been an even number
but lets hope so , cant see anyone getting close to leith though
No problem.
It ended up with 11 teams because after doing a trawl the association couldn't find another team to join and make up 12.
Leith will take some catching. In all fairness, they are very good side to watch.
Just to put things in perspective, if you have a look at the performance of the Division I teams in the Scottish Cup, South East Region Cup and Ken Ritchie, you can see just how powerful the Division I was. For instance, the winners, two semi finalists and four quarter finalists in the Scottish Cup came from our Division I. Not bad.
|
newboy
Member
| Joined: | Tue Jun 3rd, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 8 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 25th, 2008 04:24 pm |
|
Malteser
totally agree , leith are a class above, the next 2 are very strong,the next couple decent,not much to chose between the rest
but compared to other leagues definetly a very strong if not the strongest at this age level ,
dont understand why a team wouldnt jump at the chance to enter the top division is that not what natural progression is all about
or is it like last year where some teams stayed a div below so they would be favourites for there own little divisions cup !
if that was the case then the league should be only 10 teams to avoid the blank week
|
Seagull
Member
| Joined: | Fri May 30th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 10 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 26th, 2008 12:01 pm |
|
My scribbled notes from the AGM have Loanhead volunteering to go up to Division 1 to make it a round 12 teams.
Their "promotion" opened up a gap for Seton to be restored in Div 2 as they had not rejoined in time and were in danger of going into the bottom division.
IMO, the new Divisions 2 & 3 look pretty even and balanced and would be most surprised if there are runaway winners in there.
Should make for interesting fixtures when they come out in early August.
|
Current time is 03:38 pm | Page:   1 2 3   |
|
